Stumpokapow said:PS2 launched in October 2000 -> 6th full calendar year would be 2006.
360 launched in November 2005 -> 6th full calendar year would be 2011.
Hope the one month offset in initial launch doesn't prejudice using a calendar year comparison.
PS2 2006 -> 360 2011:
January 272,4xx -> 381,xxx (360 beats ps2)
February 309,2xx -> 535,xxx (360 beats ps2)
March 276,8xx -> 433,xxx (360 beats ps2)
April 206,9xx -> 297,xxx (360 beats ps2)
May 231,6xx -> 270,xxx (360 beats ps2)
June 311,9xx -> 507,xxx (360 beats ps2)
July 241,9xx
August 262,4xx
Sep 306,5xx
Oct 235,0xx
Nov 664,xxx
Dec 1,394,xxx
So, uh, yeah.
PS2 vs X360 (6th year lifespan):
PS2 X360
Jan 272K 381K
Feb 309K 535K
Mar 276K 433K
Apr 207K 297K
May 232K 270K
Jun 312K 507K
Total 1,608 2,423
shinnn said:PS2 = $129.99 (?)
That's not terrible, all things considered. Probably won't do as well on the PS3 but I'm guessing it could hit 100k LTD combined?Stumpokapow said:Less dismal, ~35,000.
Meisadragon said:PS3 hasn't had a price drop since 2009, and according to the numbers parminedes posted, it's actually selling a lot WW, so I don't think Sony is feeling pressured right now. They haven't increased their fiscal year projection as well, so yeah, $50 price cut max. They need to do something about the US market, though. Right now it is slipping away from them.
Stumpokapow said:PS2 launched in October 2000 -> 6th full calendar year would be 2006.
360 launched in November 2005 -> 6th full calendar year would be 2011.
Hope the one month offset in initial launch doesn't prejudice using a calendar year comparison.
PS2 2006 -> 360 2011:
January 272,4xx -> 381,xxx (360 beats ps2)
February 309,2xx -> 535,xxx (360 beats ps2)
March 276,8xx -> 433,xxx (360 beats ps2)
April 206,9xx -> 297,xxx (360 beats ps2)
May 231,6xx -> 270,xxx (360 beats ps2)
June 311,9xx -> 507,xxx (360 beats ps2)
July 241,9xx
August 262,4xx
Sep 306,5xx
Oct 235,0xx
Nov 664,xxx
Dec 1,394,xxx
So, uh, yeah.
walking fiend said:depends on the price, launched at 299$ and below, it'll sell like pasta. Point is, HD consoles haven't sold much more than 100 million combined, even if we exclude thoses with bricked consoles or both consoles, and if the departure from core PC market and PS2 numbers are anything to go by, there are at least 50 million core gamer that don't own an HD console. At the right price, Wii U being a next gen console, will be really attractive. Unless they somehow manage to fuck up Online.
ThisWreckage said:This generation has taught us that it is important to be the first out of the gate (even if it means launching with major hardware problems) and launching at a reasonable price. Oh, and that first and second party games are a minor bullet point when people are buying the cheaper HD console just to play Madden or Call of Duty. Sony has image problems and I don't think they'll ever recover. That's with multiple price drops, free online gaming, and exclusive titles.
Subtracting the PS360 ltd from the PS2 ltd is a dubious way of determining how many core gamers are out there...it's not as if all PS2 owners were core gamers by whatever the modern definition is, and it's not as if all Wii owners are casuals. I really find it hard to believe, based on the playtime numbers we get from Nielson, that there are a significant number of gamers still clinging onto their PS2s hoping for a next-gen savior.KageMaru said:Wouldn't the PS3 or 360 be more in line with this "right price" than the Wii-U? Especially considering how both systems will likely see price drops this year.
walking fiend said:Shinen is how budget or hight?
I mean, why don't they develop for PS3/XBLA/Steam instead? Aren't those much better markets?
I kind of see it as the exact opposite. I feel like the ps3 is perhaps a bit too exotic, too complicated a machine as to not feel like its for everyone. The ps2 and I feel, now the 360, have that mass, friendly appeal of "we are just fun video game machines" for joe six pack and kids alike.outunderthestars said:It's not based on any logical reasoning, but for some reason the PS3 just seems more boring to me. Not talking about the games or any of that but just the overall product itself. It's almost like it is too understated in every possible way, down to the design of the console and the packaging. Games, hardware, and value wise it is an amazing device.
It just lacks that "sexiness" that other electronic devices seem to have.
Wouldn't last gen teach you that too? Cube and Xbox were dead even before they launched. PS2 had about a year and a half on both systems. Cube launched in NA right when FFX, MGS2, GTA3, GT3, and basically every big gun was out. Xbox wasn't even out in one area before all that hit.ThisWreckage said:This generation has taught us that it is important to be the first out of the gate (even if it means launching with major hardware problems) and launching at a reasonable price. Oh, and that first and second party games are a minor bullet point when people are buying the cheaper HD console just to play Madden or Call of Duty. Sony has image problems and I don't think they'll ever recover. That's with multiple price drops, free online gaming, and exclusive titles.
You do know that the 360 sells better in the UK, Canada and more than likely Australia too. Its not just America.SkylineRKR said:Thats the thing, Sony doesn't need to price drop in Europe and in Japan. They are practically number one in Europe since the Slim was being released, and before that they were number 2 behind the Wii. In Japan they are one eyed king in the land of the blind, best selling console but consoles sell so so there anyway.
Its America where they can't keep up. And America is the only place where Kinect seems to be a success. Sony can't offer anything remotely like it. A price drop will maybe net them a few more units sold a month, but they need something to one up Kinect to truly succeed. Move is not it.
Haha. Good one.jling84 said:I kind of see it as the exact opposite. I feel like the ps3 is perhaps a bit too exotic, too complicated a machine as to not feel like its for everyone. The ps2 and I feel, now the 360, have that mass, friendly appeal of "we are just fun video game machines" for joe six pack and kids alike.
market wise or logical?Wouldn't the PS3 or 360 be more in line with this "right price" than the Wii-U?Especially considering how both systems will likely see price drops this year.
They should have made a Wii version.man they really should have kept Child of Eden a XBLA game.
really a shame, hope they don't abandon nintendo completely, specially since their 3DS game will probably wont sell muchThey found their niche there, but I doubt that they'll do any further WiiWare projects as even they noticed the downturn of WiiWare with FAST.
jling84 said:I kind of see it as the exact opposite. I feel like the ps3 is perhaps a bit too exotic, too complicated a machine as to not feel like its for everyone. The ps2 and I feel, now the 360, have that mass, friendly appeal of "we are just fun video game machines" for joe six pack and kids alike.
shintoki said:Wouldn't last gen teach you that too? Cube and Xbox were dead even before they launched. PS2 had about a year and a half on both systems. Cube launched in NA right when FFX, MGS2, GTA3, GT3, and basically every big gun was out. Xbox wasn't even out in one area before all that hit.
ThisWreckage said:This generation has taught us that it is important to be the first out of the gate (even if it means launching with major hardware problems) and launching at a reasonable price. Oh, and that first and second party games are a minor bullet point when people are buying the cheaper HD console just to play Madden or Call of Duty. Sony has image problems and I don't think they'll ever recover. That's with multiple price drops, free online gaming, and exclusive titles.
Magic Ovaries said:Age of expensive dedicated portable gaming devices with $40 games is over. Its not 3DS vs. Vita. Is 3DS/Vita vs. Android/iOS.
3DS and Vita are in the same boat.
sTeLioSco said:cant believe shadows of the damned on 2 platforms sold 24,000 copies!
i thought that's impossible to happen,when was it released?
"Child of Eden, the NPD told Joystiq, sold approximately 34,000 units in its debut month, ranking at number 83. At the same time, Shadows of the Damned managed to sell 24,000 copies, combined, on PS3 and Xbox 360. Damn."
http://www.joystiq.com/2011/07/15/zelda-sold-well-in-june-child-of-eden-and-shadows-of-the-damned/
Unless you're Sega, eh?ThisWreckage said:This generation has taught us that it is important to be the first out of the gate (even if it means launching with major hardware problems) and launching at a reasonable price.
Japanese gamers aren't buying Western titles but Western studios aren't retreating to handhelds. The only reason Japanese devs are moving to handhelds is because Japanese gamers have shown that they want portability over the experiences PC/consoles can do.RaijinFY said:And people wonder why japanese developers are focusing on handhelds...
Mr. B Natural said:That's all well and good (and surprising) but what made the ps2 such a beast was the global domination. But, you gotta figure the unfairness of such a comparison. The cards were stacked for Sony in that regard.
sTeLioSco said:cant believe shadows of the damned on 2 platforms sold 24,000 copies!
i thought that's impossible to happen,when was it released?
Mr_Brit said:Edit: Also, Child of Eden and Shadows of the Damned are incredibly niche games and anyone who expected them to do much, much better than they did was crazy, that's not to say that they shouldn't have done closer to 50K though.
Mr_Brit said:Japanese gamers aren't buying Western titles but Western studios aren't retreating to handhelds. The only reason Japanese devs are moving to handhelds is because Japanese gamers have shown that they want portability over the experiences PC/consoles can do.
Edit: Also, Child of Eden and Shadows of the Damned are incredibly niche games and anyone who expected them to do much, much better than they did was crazy, that's not to say that they shouldn't have done closer to 50K though.
I have it at 46 million. I don't believe it will ever hit 47 million.gundamkyoukai said:Talking about the PS2 they will never be another system like it .
I wonder what the LTD is for it in USA.
Same here. If it wasn't for GAF mentioning it in nearly every thread I would have no idea the game came out. This is a textbook case of how you don't market a niche Japanese game.Jin34 said:It's because Nintendo owners don't buy 3rd party g... oh wait. Also as, someone who loved No More Heroes, I had zero clue when this game was coming out much less that it was out already. It's damn near publisher malpractice.
I think the 360 could catch it if MS doesnt pull the plug on itjvm said:I have it at 46 million. I don't believe it will ever hit 47 million.
TheOddOne said:That isn't so crazy, because EA did nothing to promote it.
jling84 said:I think the 360 could catch it if MS doesnt pull the plug on it
Mr_Brit said:Same here. If it wasn't for GAF mentioning it in nearly every thread I would have no idea the game came out. This is a textbook case of how you don't market a niche Japanese game.
gerg said:Well, then, I don't think that Motion+ really ever represented much potential for hardware sales momentum. As you yourself wrote, the gamer that bought the Wii for Wii Sports was happy with Wii Sports back in 2006.
gerg said:I meant "upgrade" as in "buy a new console for new gameplay experiences". It was unclear, I admit.
Mael said:Take it on the side of the customer for once :
You bought a Wii for the cool possibilities it could offer and the new gameplay and all you're greeted with (appart from the Wii line) are NSMBW, Mario Kart and a bunch of games you didn't buy on GC anyway (since you didn't buy a GC to begin with).
Why would you buy a new hardware from a manufacturer that never follow through on their promises anyway?
They should have released that Zelda game 2 years ago as it is, they should have made something interesting with WM+ but they really did nothing at all.
gerg said:This may all be fair and true, but pragmatically you need to consider the situation in, say, 2010 in regards to a new project. At that point, no matter whose fault or blame it is, putting a major title on the Wii would be a waste.
jling84 said:I think the 360 could catch it if MS doesnt pull the plug on it
SkylineRKR said:The Ps3 with its updates, installs and XMB is certainly less in your face than the 360 is. Its more of a hardcore gamers machine, with its higher price and lots of single player games still coming from Sony itself.
If there's no Xbox 3 in 2012, 360 should be at 40M 2 years from now at current pace of sales. Then it can slowly sell a couple million units, though it probably won't reach PS2.gundamkyoukai said:They would have to sell 20 million more guess it will depend on when next gen gets here .
In the past 12 months Microsoft has sold 7.3 million Xbox 360 systems in the U.S. That's the system's best 12-month period ever. So 20 million would take around 3 years at that best rate.gundamkyoukai said:They would have to sell 20 million more guess it will depend on when next gen gets here .
madmackem said:Does the slim ps3 not support that?.
jvm said:In the past 12 months Microsoft has sold 7.3 million Xbox 360 systems in the U.S. That's the system's best 12-month period ever. So 20 million would take around 3 years at that best rate.
We really don't have anywhere near enough data for you to make that statement. The software sales are likely less than when there were more games released, but how much less and what the absolute numbers are we have no idea. I remember checking back when we got more data what percentage of total monthly sales that usually come from the top ten, and IIRC it was less than 20%.walking fiend said:btw, Wii is not the current market leader, because it doesn't move software and apparently people aren't playing much on it.