This was the exact wording of my original claim: As far as I'm aware, none of the actual rules have changed, just the edge-case enforcement.
The rule of not doxing people did not change. The enforcement changed, because a unique situation required it (or didn't, depending on your perspective) Unless someone was giving real time location information about someone old twitter would have wanted to protect before Musk got there, and they specifically said they wouldn't censor that info, then "twitter didn't do this before musk" doesn't mean a lot to me.
And there was no such posthoc olive branch given to banned accounts before musk. If you made another account, they'd ban that one too. For higher profile bans, old twitter would ban accounts for merely tweeting something that the banned user said on another platform, even if that content itself didn't violate any rules.
Elon Musk is objectively better for free speech at twitter, even if he is a hypocrite when it comes to his stated goals, and even if he could do a lot better. Twitter has barely changed (if at all) when it comes to transparency, and they have not made any actions towards reinstating all the banned accounts that came before Musk. Better than before, sure, but Musk has disappointed in a lot of ways.
Although again, "Original account is still suspended. I don't agree with that. I agree that Musk should reinstate the original account."