If Musk bans someone who is critical of him, I'm sure there's another reason why that person was actually banned.
The guy is a grade A man child and one of the biggest snow flakes on the internet. He hasn't earned any benefit of the doubt.Musk has done literally nothing to earn that sort of benefit of the doubt lol
Sending SMS probably costs a lot more money than supporting authentication apps because phone providers are probably involved. It is a reasonable decision to charge extra for that.sms one
Its not.Sending SMS probably costs a lot more money than supporting authentication apps because phone providers are probably involved. It is a reasonable decision to charge extra for that.
Then we agree. The rest of my post adds some important missing context. I don't think you should just give the benefit of the doubt to any platform who bans someone for a reason that they don't very specifically explain.Musk has done literally nothing to earn that sort of benefit of the doubt lol
The only ones who have been removed from the platform are generally the same ones who broke rules that have existed before he even bought twitter. As far as I'm aware, none of the actual rules have changed, just the edge-case enforcement.
If Musk bans someone who is critical of him, I'm sure there's another reason why that person was actually banned. Now, if you want to be critical of those bans, that's fine, but anything they did to get themselves banned you need to defend when ANYONE does that sort of thing. Does that seem fair?
Sending SMS probably costs a lot more money than supporting authentication apps because phone providers are probably involved. It is a reasonable decision to charge extra for that.
Elon Musk is such a pussy lol. He wants freedom of speech until you say something against him lol
Then we agree. The rest of my post adds some important missing context. I don't think you should just give the benefit of the doubt to any platform who bans someone for a reason that they don't very specifically explain.
People should always be critical of social media bans, and Musk's version of Twitter is no exception.
We’ve reached peak shitposting
Well, if any Twitter competitor has a chance at dethroning the king, surely it's the one by the guy that made the king.
Twitter founder Jack Dorsey launches new social media platform Bluesky to rival the bird app
Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s former CEO and founder launched his own social media platform today, called Bluesky. Bluesky is based on the principle of allowing users to build a shared and open social media platform.www.firstpost.com
No, No! He's taking this super serious, did you not see the photos he posted of a dog in the chain and the dog photoshops? This man is totally taking this serious.I'm guessing he wasn't planning to step down at all.
I read the actual reasoning behind his decision and I agreed with it. He's still a hypocrite for doing so after saying otherwise, but I also still agree with the logic behind the choice. I've posted about it at length before. And the user wasn't permanently banned either, which is a lot more than I can say for the way the old guard ran things.Musk banned ElonJet because of whatever reason he wanted to make up at that time, so maybe you weren't aware that the actual rules had changed but you are now
I read the actual reasoning behind his decision and I agreed with it. He's still a hypocrite for doing so after saying otherwise, but I also still agree with the logic behind the choice. I've posted about it at length before. And the user wasn't permanently banned either, which is a lot more than I can say for the way the old guard ran things.
Anyhow, in other news:
I agree with the reasoning that the user was banned, but I'm glad they were not permanently banned. If you're going ban a topic from discussion on your platform, I believe you should do just that. Make it very clear was isn't allowed to be said, and ban the speech not the user. People should only be removed from platforms for repeated violations of clearly defined and openly stated rules that are as close to being objectively enforced as possible, IMO.You agree with the reasoning despite the user not being permanently banned? And not the journalists that reported it either. It’s either doxxing or it’s not, and Musk didn’t even stick to his own internal logic so it’s weird that you would.
I agree with the reasoning that the user was banned, but I'm glad they were not permanently banned. If you're going ban a topic from discussion on your platform, I believe you should do just that. Make it very clear was isn't allowed to be said, and ban the speech not the user. People should only be removed from platforms for repeated violations of clearly defined and openly stated rules that are as close to objectively defined as possible, IMO.
A name and known workforce might give the sense of security that people/advertisers/developers/govs are looking for. Especially if it has a front end comms department ready to go and hit the ground running with previously established relationships.Bluesky is essentially Mastodon with a corporate-backed protocol and actual investors. So it will probably gain some serious leverage as all of the various social media apps connect with it in time. Hopefully it does well, we need more competition in this space as Twitter has devolved and is unreliable (in numerous senses of the word) and Reddit is basically a testing ground for writing bots to repost old content these days.
I am into the Fediverse (the collection of apps that use ActivityPub) and it's swell and all, but it's not seeing the growth and support it needs basically because it's maintained by various tech workers out of the goodness of our hearts.
Also:
Things are breathtakingly bad over at Twitter now. Woof. And people still support Musk. He even fired that sycophant woman who was sleeping in the office. The winner of this entire debacle is clearly Jack Dorsey. The dude spun Bluesky as a separate project when he was still at Twitter. Gets Musk to overpay by tens of billions of dollars for Twitter, I assume predicting it would cave under his "leadership". Insures Bluesky development and IP was not part of the sale. Gets to hire a bunch of the quality engineers Musk fired to support this project as it enters beta. Jack fucking won, big time, and Bluesky hasn't even taken off yet.
Twitter went down after Musk’s latest purge of workers – 19 funniest responses
One of the first things Elon Musk did after buying Twitter was to sack a lot of staff, and it’s the one area of policy in which he’s been consistent. Elon Musk reportedly sacked more Twitter staff this weekend, including some of his most senior people PR and Branding expert @MarkBorkowski says...www.thepoke.co.uk
Halli, a 45 year-old designer, gained nation-wide recognition this year when, after the sale of his tech company Ueno to Twitter, he chose to be paid the sale price as wages. Normally in such large sales, the payment comes in the form of stock or other financial instruments, which categorize the sale as capital gains, meaning it is taxed at a much lower rate. Halli, however, gladly paid the higher tax rate, having spoken publicly on many occasions about the benefits he has received from the Icelandic social system.
One of his best-known projects is Ramp Up Iceland, which is building ramps throughout the nation to increase accessibility for people in wheelchairs. He has also personally donated to the legal funds of victims of sexual abuse, and has garnered praise for charitable donations to families in need this holiday season.
What is a creator on Twitter? Like someone who drives engagement?Any creators with Twitter Blue get their share ad money?
It's difficult to say from that wording in the initial announcement. There hasn't been much else said.What is a creator on Twitter? Like someone who drives engagement?
What you define as "musk's whims" essentially come down to the subjective question of what constitutes private personal information that shouldn't be publicly shared with others. Personally, I believe that not allowing real-time location info does not violate the spirit and value of free speech, in the same way that I believe not allowing slurs does not violate the spirit and value of free speech. You do not need slurs or real time location info to make any sort of point, express an opinion, explain your values, talk about your beliefs, etc. That's not to say that I want the government to decide such matters.so it's ok for users to be temporarily suspended or otherwise have their access limited on Musk's whims, but your line is drawn only on permanent bans?
Why?"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet" is some hilarious shit though lol
I assume it's because Elon should have already known that.Why?
Thats because it's exactly what is happening. Everyone thought this guy was some tech guru genius and he turn out to be an idiot that tripped and fell to the top of the top of the world without anyone noticing he didn't know what he was doing somehow.Elon keeps acting like a person continuously learning basic internet etiquette lessons that he already should know.
What you define as "musk's whims" essentially come down to the subjective question of what constitutes private personal information that shouldn't be publicly shared with others. Personally, I believe that not allowing real-time location info does not violate the spirit and value of free speech, in the same way that I believe not allowing slurs does not violate the spirit and value of free speech. You do not need slurs or real time location info to make any sort of point, express an opinion, explain your values, talk about your beliefs, etc. That's not to say that I want the government to decide such matters.
And yes, temporary bans intended to guide people to compliance with the restrictions of a platform are always better than permanent bans.
Yet the guy stays tweeting
Elon really is a moron.
But this vid rocks.
And?He had no choice BUT to tweet ... HR wouldn't contact him back ... The man had his company bought by Twitter... And he has muscular dystrophy
And?
Is this an appeal to emotion?
Seems the disability is used as an appeal to emotion. Musk wasn't wrong, the guy was tweeting 24/7, if you can tweet, you can write code.No. But you should think about why he had to tweet Musk after he said he couldn't get an answer from HR ... He explained why ... And yet Musk was a total DICK to him. The man is NOT a good person NOR a good boss. Not even an effective one at Twitter... He keeps showing it time and again. He's going to lose more money running that thing into the ground. Which might be a good thing if it gives the competition an opening. Fuck Twitter before and after Musk!
Seems the disability is used as an appeal to emotion. Musk wasn't wrong, the guy was tweeting 24/7, if you can tweet, you can write code.
They've had V2T programs for 20+ years now. Probably how he has been tweeting as much as the rest of them before and after he is gone.He was managerial position. That's his job within Twitter after they bought his company. Not coding. He has MD... He can't type like that anymore.
Also, I hope that Musk actually pays him or he might have a lawsuit on his hands.
They've had V2T programs for 20+ years now. Probably how he has been tweeting as much as the rest of them before and after he is gone.