kafka rock opera
Member
FOR team woop woop. Im a sucker for ARPGs and norse storylines.
Doc Evils said:which is why I quoted it?
eznark said:<AWKWARD PAUSE>
Francias Castiglione said:How the fuck does that say "it will be better than MGS4" ?
Aaron said:Was MGS4 well received? Yes. Was GTA4 well received? Yes. There, nothing to it.
thetrin said:<educated statement about the difference between slaves and peasants>
Put me in the "Keeping an open mind" camp, but I played it at the last Microsoft event and had a good time, so.
Y2Kev said:lol at everyone saying against
it's like even people who trash this game 24/7 are saying for and then the hardcore clueless trolls are like "AGAINST!!! I HAT DENIS AND HIS CRAPPY GAME!!"
Denis Dyack said:I think it is time to draw the digital line. Too Human will be out in August and I think there is going to be a lot of trolls crying here. Either way when the game comes out this forum will likely be on fire. So in order to try to put it out some gasoline on this fire I will ask those interested to stand up and be counted.
I feel Too Human is a great game, likely to be better than most that will come out this year. I certainly feel it is the best game we have ever made. I also believe the press and gamers alike will believe this. This puts me in the For camp.
I know there are many who feel strongly in opposite camp. I also would ask you to stand up and say Against.
When the game is released and everyone plays game all the speculation will be over. If I am wrong and gamers in general think the game is crap then I am comfortable with getting tagged Owned by the GAF.
However, if I am right and it is received well, I would like to see those Against to be tagged with Owned by Too Human.
Lakitu said:For sure, no?
WrikaWrek said:How about this, pass 3rd grade and learn what the word "most" means. Then come back and purpose shit.
He didn't said that. And why are you posting in this thread if you don't give a shit about the game?
You too, pass 3rd grade and then come back. Jesus christ, why don't people know how to read?
lawblob said:For
Any developer with the stones to interact with GAF like this gets my respect. You the man, Denis.
Madman said:Wow. You are that bothered by GAF's reaction? You do realize that plenty of games/developers get flamed here as well, right?
This bet makes no sense. Who defines how Too Human turns out? It's already established fanbase that would think the same of it no matter what? Those who have trolled the game that would think the same of it no matter what? NPD results? Gaming critics? Me? You?
How about we just let things go as they may and not have this thread?
v0yce said::lol :lol :lol
LiK said:Denis, i will judge the game when it comes out. i am still NEUTRAL.
Who are "gamers in general" and what benchmark determines if a game is "crap" or "received well"?
sinnergy said:Not possible, you are either FOR or NOT! :lol How dare you be unbiased!
I agree.duckroll said:I'm glad that you feel Too Human is a great game, seeing how you're the one making it, if you thought it wasn't a great game that would be worrying. It's great that you feel it's the best game you've never made too, but that really means nothing to me. None of that really translates into why the game is great or how the game is great. Your job is to convince other people that the game is worth buying, not convince yourself.
That's a pretty shallow and unfair bet there. I mean, what rules would we be using? Who are "gamers in general" and what benchmark determines if a game is "crap" or "received well"? Furthermore, this seem unfair as you don't really post much on the forum at all. If the game fails, it is likely that you would not post ever again here. What good would a tag do in that case?
Aaron said:Was MGS4 well received? Yes. Was GTA4 well received? Yes. There, nothing to it.
Denis Dyack said:However, if I am right and it is received well, I would like to see those Against to be tagged with Owned by Too Human.
Speevy said:Did this thread strike someone as a good idea?
Itagaki wouldn't even start this thread, and he's insane.
NinjaFridge said:Please don't group me along with the Against crowd or the For crowd. I don't give a shit about this game, it isn't on my radar at all. He says that gamers will agree that this is the best game they ever made - what if they don't? What if they just don't like the game? Are they wrong for having a difference of opinion? This thread is asking for people to be tagged for having a different opinion on a game which is just stupid.
Why would anyone say no. Dyack will get this new tag whether 1 person or 1 million say against.Y2Kev said:lol at everyone saying against
it's like even people who trash this game 24/7 are saying for and then the hardcore clueless trolls are like "AGAINST!!! I HAT DENIS AND HIS CRAPPY GAME!!"
Speevy said:Did this thread strike someone as a good idea?
Itagaki wouldn't even start this thread, and he's insane.
duckroll said:I'm glad that you feel Too Human is a great game, seeing how you're the one making it, if you thought it wasn't a great game that would be worrying. It's great that you feel it's the best game you've never made too, but that really means nothing to me. None of that really translates into why the game is great or how the game is great. Your job is to convince other people that the game is worth buying, not convince yourself.
That's a pretty shallow and unfair bet there. I mean, what rules would we be using? Who are "gamers in general" and what benchmark determines if a game is "crap" or "received well"? Furthermore, this seem unfair as you don't really post much on the forum at all. If the game fails, it is likely that you would not post ever again here. What good would a tag do in that case?