AJUMP23
Member
The guy who uploads these videos is really on point.
And this interview with Nimoy is amazing.
This one really demonstrates the gap between ST and Nutrek:
Brilliant contrast
The guy who uploads these videos is really on point.
And this interview with Nimoy is amazing.
This one really demonstrates the gap between ST and Nutrek:
Am I the only one bothered by the fact that...
Picard just randomly decided to bang bev on shoreleave? I feel like he would have never done this while still her superior officer and you know, captain of the freaking starship Enterprise.
That's my only complaint so far.
It's not random. Did you not notice their constant flirtations? The admission to her that he was in love with her?
Of course I knew he wanted to and loved her, that shit is obvious from episode 1, I just never saw him acting upon it while still her Captain.
Someone else who never watched Season 7 and comes into the thread without a frame of reference.Of course I knew he wanted to and loved her, that shit is obvious from episode 1, I just never saw him acting upon it while still her Captain.
A little spur of the moment kiss ain't the same as shagging lol.Someone else who never watched Season 7 and comes into the thread without a frame of reference.
They were literally married in the future timeline in that episode.A little spur of the moment kiss ain't the same as shagging lol
What episode was it?They were literally married in the future timeline in that episode.
Only the biggest episode in the series history.What episode was it?
What episode was it?
When I see re runs i rarely run into season 7 episodes, no doubt i've forgotten stuff
Ok just wanted to make sure that was it and not a different one."All Good Things..."
Ok just wanted to make sure that was it and not a different one.
As i recall, that's a timeline that is now changed, and did the episode mention when they were wed?
Yeah, I might have enjoyed the dialogue and acting that took place during Picard and Beverly's conversation, but I think it still absolutely kills Crusher as a likeable character. It'd be one thing if the mother in this scenario was someone the audience had never met, like with Carol Marcus...even she came off as a cold as hell bitch to me who wanted to keep their son to herself because she "wanted him in my world" instead of jumping through the universe with his father. Bitch, that ain't your choice, BUT the difference in that situation was Kirk knew and respected her shitty decision. He stayed away, he knew David existed, she didn't hide his existence from him.Yeah, the future version of events in All Good Things is not canon in any way; it was one possible future at that point in time, but completely changed now by their foreknowledge of it. Many key parts of that future were already invalidated. Data still being alive, to name a big one; or Deanna being dead.
But the biggest problem is that All Good Things treated the characters with respect in its future. This show doesn't; it made up an absolutely absurd out-of-character betrayal by Crusher just to have more cheap drama and a reason for conflict. Extremely poor writing.
Let me add that Picard's desire for a family was well known by those close to him (it was the central theme of Generations, after all); and he filled in as a father figure for Crusher's previous son Wesley in so many ways that meant the world to her. Combining those two background facts, there's no way that Beverly would do that to him and just decide to keep their child a secret. If you accept that as canon, you must now accept that Crusher is simply an irredeemable character, a complete fraud compared to what she once was. I'd rather just recognize it as bad fan fiction by a team who doesn't understand how to write for this franchise, and who decided to take a Kirk plot from STII and carry it over to Picard where it makes no sense.
Not sure the obsession with things having to be the same as AGT, Ent D w/ third nacelle obviously didn't happen, no dead Troi, presumably no Riker/Worf feud, no Admiral Riker. I never saw AGT as the canonical future of TNG.
That said, nothing wrong with Picard and Crusher having a romance. Teenage-style drama and a secret pregnancy on the other hand...
Understood, but I've seen it brought up so many times in this thread ("see? Geordi's kid has the same name, wow, such deep knowledge of canon") when the problem with STPicard is that they pull out random bits without understanding any of it.AGT may not be canon, but it's extremely good at setting up and depicting very possible, and even probable, futures for all of the crew. I see no character-wise issue with Bev and Picard having a romance while still on duty together.
looolDoctoring Without Borders the warzones of the galaxy with Botox Bev
You would Think Dorn would destroy Stewart. But they are actors so they may all be weak."Patrick Stewart and Michael Dorn used to wrestle"
Looks like a lot of fun on the bridge of the Enterprise D.
The whole interview with Jonathan Frakes is quite interesting.
oMG y R U gAtkeEEping!If you’re not a fan of episode 4 of season 3 of Picard, then you’ve never been a fan of Star Trek.
It was aight, but couldnt see shit cause the sets are dark as a black holeA very simple equation:
If you’re not a fan of episode 4 of season 3 of Picard, then you’ve never been a fan of Star Trek.
Glorious stuff.
Now Shaw‘s name makes sense. Wolf 359 was his USS Indianapolis. While Sisko was able to forgive Picard eventually, Shaw never could, probably because he was younger at the time.A very simple equation:
If you’re not a fan of episode 4 of season 3 of Picard, then you’ve never been a fan of Star Trek.
Glorious stuff.
I don’t know why the bridge is not well lit anymore. Maybe to show off ill the blinks lights on the bridge.It was aight, but couldnt see shit cause the sets are dark as a black hole
It is mediocre. You can’t go home again and it is not as good as TNG. The 4th episode has been the best this season.So is this show any good? I love TNG. I tried watching this when it first started and could t get into it at all. Did it get any better?
It's been like that since First Contact.I don’t know why the bridge is not well lit anymore. Maybe to show off ill the blinks lights on the bridge.
A very simple equation:
If you’re not a fan of episode 4 of season 3 of Picard, then you’ve never been a fan of Star Trek.
Glorious stuff.
I have a challenge for you all. I want a plausible, minimally rational explanation for the insane "10 Forward Ave" situation on Star Trek Picard.
Make it make sense, somehow, because it seems impossible to do so.
Here's what you have to unify somehow:
- Guinan apparently had a bar on "10 Forward Ave" before joining the Enterprise D
- she returned to it after those years
- but on TNG, 10 forward referrerd to the position of the bar, since it was the forward position of the 10th deck; it wasn't some kind of name she was at liberty to choose
So she had a bar in the past on a street which just magically happened to have the same address as the deck designation of the room on the Enterprise D where she would later bartend? This is such a mind warping illogical idea that I was aghast that they didn't immediately bury it in season 3, but actually returned there to keep reminding us that logic has no place in this new universe.