OldJadedGamer said:
As a Laserdisc owner, I can say from my personal opinion that I believe as well that Blu-ray is just the big brother of Laserdisc.
It doesn't matter what you personally feel, his point was that BD has faster uptake than LD ever did, which it does. I actually mostly agree with you about the jump in quality/content versus the price difference, but it's clear that not every consumer shares this outlook. Blu-ray is very clearly trending between DVD and LD in terms of sales success.
Edit: Looking back, you did call it "the big brother", so perhaps that was meant to indicate its greater success, and the rest was all about subjective "feel". If so, please ignore my response.
OldJadedGamer said:
I do for HD quality movies like Wall-E but not for older classics like Full Metal Jacket. Those movies IMO look just as good upscaled on DVD.
Your opinion is wrong, or at least stated badly. Barring tremendously hideous transfers to BD, it is literally impossible for upscaled DVD to "look just as good". What you mean to say is, "I don't care that it looks worse" or "I can't tell that it looks worse." Whether it does, in fact, look worse is a matter of brute fact, not opinion.
This is a particularly apposite example because I've owned both the DVD and BD of
Full Metal Jacket and looked at them back to back. Of course, the BD looks better (though it's certainly your right to value that difference however you care to, all the way down to zero value).