For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
jvm said:For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
Gamespot.com A site of honesty and integrity said:One game apparently hit hard by the decline was the PlayStation 3 exclusive touted as a "Halo killer" by Sony loyalists, Killzone 2. After years in the making and a reported $21 million budget, the game sold just 58,000 units last month
The Faceless Master said:i dunno why people visit them post gerstmann-gate.
DMeisterJ said:lol, No one said KZ2 was a Halo Killer. That was KZ1.
And 21 million? I thought it was 40?
Thats beautiful :loljvm said:For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
jvm said:For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
3 years ago it was supposedly going to be 21 million. With delays and such..... yea its going to be moreDMeisterJ said:lol, No one said KZ2 was a Halo Killer. That was KZ1.
And 21 million? I thought it was 40?
Jesus. Just keeps on chugging.jvm said:For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
The beauty of Google News custom search email updates...The Faceless Master said:i dunno why people visit them post gerstmann-gate.
Amazing :loljvm said:For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
crazyjvm said:For the sake of having data in one place:
Halo 3 = 67,000 in April 2009 NPD
Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6210049.html
Which ones? The Nintendo elephants?Akai said:Amazing if you ignore the two elephants in the room...
I agree.legend166 said:Dunno if anyone's talked about this yet, but I think it's got some bearing on the hardware sales. Someone posted a thread over on the OT about Blu-Ray hardware sales. The average price of a standalone player is now $261, compared to $393 a year ago
So basically, I think we've reached the point where Blu-Ray compatibility is no longer a selling point for the PS3, due to the price difference. I think that's a major reason why it's down on last years sales and will continue to be for quite awhile.