Galian Beast said:
Yet you have no fact to back that up, you don't KNOW that is the reason. Pokemon Yellow was the 4th game using the same engine, and Crystal is effectively the 7th...
You're right. I am speculating. I never claimed otherwise. You are the one claiming that Pokemon, as a franchise, is no longer healthy, and in that you are DISASTROUSLY and HILARIOUSLY wrong. I'm merely trying to give a possible (and believable) explanation as to why I think Emerald isn't selling as well as its predecessors.
You don't see the media reporting the fact that Capcom is in the dumps, you don't hear it until it happens or realize it until its obvious. Fact is the franchises sales have been constantly going down. Maybe you'll hear the media report it when brand new pokemon games sell only 2 million copies total in japan, maybe even 3 million. The games are about 700k copies a piece from hitting 1.5 million in japan each for new installments. Emerald has already gone below that for what you would call an expansion.
As I said, I'll believe Pokemon is dead, or even "diseased" if Pokemon DS fails.
Learn how to read. You'd realize what I was talking about. Legend of Dragoon is simply an example of a game where resources factor into a game selling a million, but not being succesful. I did not say that resources were a factor for pokemon specifically.
Once again, my reading is just fine. Your logic, on the other hand, is not. As I said, Legend of Dragoon is entirely irrelevant. Pokemon Emerald isn't trying to start a new franchise, and it isn't a nameless entity that has to be expensively marketed (or resourced) in order to garner high sales. Emerald was a relatively quick and easy project for Nintendo, neither expensive to fund or to market, and it's making a killing at retail (and will undoubtedly do so again when it hits Europe and America.) Everything about Legend of Dragoon differs from the Pokemon Emerald scenario.
LOL... clearly you haven't played the pokemon games...
I own and have played every single Pokemon RPG released stateside, and even most of the non-RPG ones. I have an excellent understanding of what the various color groupings entail and offer.
Two games are released A/B, they are for the most part the SAME game, and C another version is released of that same game, simply more advanced. It's not an expansion or a spinoff or anything.
Pokemon Yellow essentially featured the same quest as Red/Blue, only with different Pokemon, a couple of new fights, and a couple of new areas to explore. The amount of new content added to it wasn't particularly staggering. It is often considered to be Pokemon 1.5, where Red/Bue are Pokemon 1. Likewise, Silver/Gold are Pokemon 2, and Crystal is their expansion, or 2.5. Ruby and Sapphire are Pokemon 3, and Emerald is their 3.5. It's pretty clear cut.
FFTA is a part of the Final Fantasy Tactics series, and is far removed from the actual Final Fantasy games. It simply bears the title FF. It's clearly not part of the series FF1-11.
What's your point? Your brought up FF in this discussion. I brought up another FF as a counterpoint. I too don't consider FFT or FFTA to be part of the FF1-11 subset, but unlike you (apparently) I do consider it to be part of the FF series at large.
I understand you are a newcomer to our planet, so I don't blame you for failing to make yourself completely well understood. [/beep] End of line.