Risible
Member
Sho_Nuff82 said:Mods blind-firing from behind cover.
Holy shit, lolz.
Sho_Nuff82 said:Mods blind-firing from behind cover.
Wait for it...........With the proper capture equipment coming you too will be a changed gamer!Krakatoa said:You should have got Lasik done and saved a few $$$
rhubbard16 said:You can run CIE specific test patterns X,Y, at a native rate from USB, also to be correct before running said test patterns you will need to match resolution input/output before having a correct pattern to display and calibrate content on. Since there is a slow point here not all HDMI are created equal content constraints are a huge limited in testing the signal path for errors.
rhubbard16 said:Both are completely improved. The display is modified, the signal path is modified, the source content is modified. All calibrated to 1998 CIE standards in HD CS.
Snuggler said:Just out of curiosity, what kind of drugs are you on?
The only way to prove your point is either posting really good pictures. Something where you can compare, not guess. Or getting comparative measurements of the HDMI eye output of the PS3 original and modified.rhubbard16 said:RON? Both are completely improved. The display is modified, the signal path is modified, the source content is modified. All calibrated to 1998 CIE standards in HD CS.
Wazzim said:what is this thread even about
Now you are talking "Mickey Mouse Bullshit" good GAF!jim-jam bongs said:Here's the deal, yo.
One of the biggest differences between analogue and digital signals is that, in the case of analogue signals, the signal itself can be incomplete but still contain enough information to be correctly interpreted by the receiver. This is not the case for digital information, because it's made up of on/off (1/0) information which does not in itself describe to the receiver how to actually interpret it; as such, it needs to be converted from digital information into a digital representation of analogue information then sent to the receiver.
So the reality is that you can improve analogue signals with physical alterations because they can contain small amounts of interference without dying totally, but that isn't the case at all with digital signals. I'm not sure what Mr Hubbard thinks he has done here, but you can't make the 1s and 0s bigger in a digital signal or anything like that. They are what they are.
rhubbard16 said:Now you are talking "Mickey Mouse Bullshit" good GAF!
Dragon said:How to troll everyone by L Ron Hubbard.
Audiophile adjustments hmm I think not? Leave google alone! let me enlighten you to the world of electronics today.FoxSpirit said:The only way to prove your point is either posting really good pictures. Something where you can compare, not guess. Or getting comparative measurements of the HDMI eye output of the PS3 original and modified.
Talk is nothing.
Also, may I be frank? You are deluding yourself. I don't mean that in any hostile way but face it: you made audiophile adjustments to improve the output of the digital HDMI transmitter. Think about it. The ONLY thing that may have improved something is soldering the HDMI which may have suffered from a bad connection.
So far there have been 2 transmitters:
http://www.ps3devwiki.com/index.php?title=HDMI#Padout_IC.3F_.28HDMI_transmitter.29
(mine has the older Silicon Image Sil9132CBU transmitter btw)
Why would you dismiss someone who has valid points with a response like this? If his points are invalid, why not simply explain how?rhubbard16 said:Now you are talking "Mickey Mouse Bullshit" good GAF!
This is correct. Without high-quality comparison shots of the video output between an unmodded PS3 and a modded PS3, how can you show any difference?FoxSpirit said:The only way to prove your point is either posting really good pictures. Something where you can compare, not guess. Or getting comparative measurements of the HDMI eye output of the PS3 original and modified.
My English? You just used the word weirdly! WEIRDLY!Blizzard said:Why would you dismiss someone who has valid points with a response like this? If his points are invalid, why not simply explain how?
This is correct. Without high-quality comparison shots of the video output between an unmodded PS3 and a modded PS3, how can you show any difference?
In addition, I mean no offense, but is English your first language? Your posts are phrased weirdly.
rhubbard16 said:My English? You just used the word weirdly! WEIRDLY!
Not only is "weirdly" an English word, but it is even in the Scrabble dictionary.rhubbard16 said:My English? You just used the word weirdly! WEIRDLY!
rhubbard16 said:Audiophile adjustments hmm I think not? Leave google alone! let me enlighten you to the world of electronics today.
These useless un-yielding quality hardware you so thoughtfully refrence are assembled everyday for "Video"Blu-Ray players on a "GLOBAL" scale in every Pioneer Elite,Meridian,Sony ES, Krell,Rotel,Runco,Denon,Oppo with some of the best refrence imaging possible at 1920x1080 progressive. Oh but Im sure the 5 star ratings from passing all the absolute strictes of video test patterns are all made up from people like me. At CES all the awards recieved are all nonsense too right? Maybe on GAF, but in the real world we have some major companies making a diffrence in quality parts assembled at a proven scientific level. I started this to urge Sony to bring an elite line to SCEA they are currently engineering and producing these atttributes to their ES Blu-Ray Players at this very minute and on their website.
but YOU know more than any of these huge succesful worldwide companies RIGHT?!
(by the way there is nothing inside the Xbox worth saving or upgrading;0)
Blizzard said:Not only is "weirdly" an English word, but it is even in the Scrabble dictionary.
Not ONLY that, but you just replied to me while ignoring every single other point and question I raised, not even answering the question about English.
how can you prove that Sony is doing this with their Blu-Ray player line? Link to an official article/documentation?rhubbard16 said:Audiophile adjustments hmm I think not? Leave google alone! let me enlighten you to the world of electronics today.
These useless un-yielding quality hardware you so thoughtfully refrence are assembled everyday for "Video"Blu-Ray players on a "GLOBAL" scale in every Pioneer Elite,Meridian,Sony ES, Krell,Rotel,Runco,Denon,Oppo with some of the best refrence imaging possible at 1920x1080 progressive. Oh but Im sure the 5 star ratings from passing all the absolute strictes of video test patterns are all made up from people like me. At CES all the awards recieved are all nonsense too right? Maybe on GAF, but in the real world we have some major companies making a diffrence in quality parts assembled at a proven scientific level. I started this to urge Sony to bring an elite line to SCEA they are currently engineering and producing these atttributes to their ES Blu-Ray Players at this very minute and on their website.
but YOU know more than any of these huge succesful worldwide companies RIGHT?!
(by the way there is nothing inside the Xbox worth saving or upgrading;0)
soultron said:Need ban ultimatum and deadline.
soultron said:Need ban ultimatum and deadline.
Uhhhh ok.Cuban Legend said:how can you prove that Sony is doing this with their Blu-Ray player line? Link to an official article/documentation?
soultron said:Need ban ultimatum and deadline.
What?! Fake GAF using any excuse to shut me up! All time low bro-Hero_of_the_Day said:I'm guessing a mod hasn't wandered in here to see him call someone gay. Once that happens, there will be no ultimatum. Only swift justice followed by a short time of peace.
Hero_of_the_Day said:I'm guessing a mod hasn't wandered in here to see him call someone gay. Once that happens, there will be no ultimatum. Only swift justice followed by a short time of peace.
rhubbard16 said:What?! Fake GAF using any excuse to shut me up! All time low bro-
I searched the term just now. Should've turned Safe Search on.Snuggler said:Actually, he called someone an individual with a bald head and overly square-like body.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31759773&postcount=740
kvn said:How old are you? Just curious.
Inflated cost because of demand you the consumer are not demanding high quality so you pay for it since it's rare.soultron said:So, let me get this straight, OP:
You think Sony is ripping consumers off since the components included in a BD player released in December of 2008 (at nearly $3K) are superior to that of a product that released in 2006, at $600?
You need to addrhubbard16 said:Inflated cost because of demand you the consumer are not demanding high quality so you pay for it since it's rare.
rhubbard16 said:Inflated cost because of demand you the consumer are not demanding high quality so you pay for it since it's rare.