• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GAF Musicians Community

What is your musical talent? (select 2 or more)

  • Stringman: I play violin, guitar, bass, mandolin, ukulele, etc

    Votes: 11 44.0%
  • Keys: I play piano, synthesizers, organ, electric piano, etc

    Votes: 8 32.0%
  • Woodwind: I fancy myself a flautist, sax player, clarinet, etc

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Brass: I'm noisy and play trumpet, french horn, tuba, trombone, etc

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Percussion: I like to hit things...drums, toms, congas, tambourine, etc

    Votes: 7 28.0%
  • Voice: I like to sing professionally, in my car, in the shower, in karaoke, in chorus, etc

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Programmer: I have a knack for producing, engineering music, I'm good with MIDI, etc

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • Collector: I don't play anything but I listen to and collect a ton of music

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Songwriter: I don't always play but I can write lyrics, poetry, etc

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • Total voters
    25

GeekyDad

Member
Quick question (well...maybe, kinda sorta):

I'm trying to reduce as much line noise as possible during the recording process. I'm going to try shutting lights and unplugging things nearby or sharing the outlet with my digital workstation (DAW), but I've also been using an older laptop (bought it about five years ago), which is parked on the same desk as the DAW. This could be embarrassingly obvious and noobish to ask, but could that be causing additional line noise (it's completely quiet to my naked ear)? I'm recording both my acoustic guitar (plugged directly into the system using a high-quality acoustic pick-up) and voice at the same time, but it's only the acoustic that is really presenting me with noticeably obtrusive line noise.
 
Last edited:

GeekyDad

Member
Not sure if anyone's still watching this thread, but if there is...

To Normalize or not to Normalize?

I've been weary of using it in the past couple of years. It's easy to see how it can fix one of my main mastering issues -- overall output, since I'm recording mostly acoustic music -- but whether they call it normalization or not, is sure seems to act like compression for a mix. And for me, I can't help but feel (hear) that I'm losing a lot of the subtly I work hours to attain.

For acoustic music, do you use it when rendering your finished mixes?
 

Happosai

Member
Not sure if anyone's still watching this thread, but if there is...

To Normalize or not to Normalize?

I've been weary of using it in the past couple of years. It's easy to see how it can fix one of my main mastering issues -- overall output, since I'm recording mostly acoustic music -- but whether they call it normalization or not, is sure seems to act like compression for a mix. And for me, I can't help but feel (hear) that I'm losing a lot of the subtly I work hours to attain.

For acoustic music, do you use it when rendering your finished mixes?
Sorry for not responding much in the topic. It's embarrassing as I'm the OP too. Anyway, personally I would not normalize as I usually isolate tracks to be mastered from FLAC to WAV and don't want to have any other audio anomalies in the way. By the way, that which I mentioned is the furthest extent of compression I use. The only reason I convert FLACs to WAV is because I'm an old fart who believes in publishing the music to CD in most cases...and FLAC for a 5 track EP would be like 5 discs...lol.

Normalization isn't quite the same as compression. Before you do anything, why not listen to some examples of standard audio without and some with. I recommend to listen to elaborate pieces of music too that implement overdubs of multiple instruments. This is where I've noticed normalization screws things up. I recently started using Apple Music and I'm listening to some classic tracks I had on CD. There's definitely something missing in the overall mix. Not sure if it's compression or normalization but it doesn't sound great. Some levels do need to have higher gain than other too. With an acoustic guitar alone, you'd want bass strings to have a different mix than the treble strings to get the fullness of the sound. It can't all just be one level or a dreadnought ends up sounding like a ukulele.
 

Mamofish

Member
The main thing I use normalization for is when using samples that are recorded really low, most of the the time normalizing a small sample it'll bring it up to snuff without altering the character much.

Here's my contribution! I used to do a lot of DAW stuff but, lately I'm enjoying just playing with synths and drum machines.

 

Happosai

Member
The main thing I use normalization for is when using samples that are recorded really low, most of the the time normalizing a small sample it'll bring it up to snuff without altering the character much.

Here's my contribution! I used to do a lot of DAW stuff but, lately I'm enjoying just playing with synths and drum machines.


Sounds awesome. I worked with a few myself and had 3 of the Korg Volcas I used to carry around to toy with portably.
 

Happosai

Member
Thanks! I love the Volcas, I have the Volca drum and it's a great little box! Thinking about the modular one..
The Volca drum is great but I'd also encourage you to try out the Volca Sampler. Plenty of percussive work to be utilized there. Korg MicroSampler is great for percussion too. I'm a sampler guy all the way back to the Korg DSS-1 (which is a beast).
 

Mamofish

Member
I had to look up the DSS-1, the thing is a beast literally and the sounds I heard coming out of it. I do have the Octatrack which is taking care of my sampling for now. I'm an Elektron fan so I have a lot of their gear. Rytm, Heat, Octatrack, Syntakt and Digitone. I've just recently got them all setup on a large pedal board for easy transport (doing open mics). Really enjoying having them all working together and finally putting somewhat of a set together.
 

Happosai

Member
I had to look up the DSS-1, the thing is a beast literally and the sounds I heard coming out of it. I do have the Octatrack which is taking care of my sampling for now. I'm an Elektron fan so I have a lot of their gear. Rytm, Heat, Octatrack, Syntakt and Digitone. I've just recently got them all setup on a large pedal board for easy transport (doing open mics). Really enjoying having them all working together and finally putting somewhat of a set together.
Octatrack is pretty cool. Feel free to share some sample tracks here for now. Some incredible gear there and liked seeing Digitone in there particularly. :)

The Korg DSS-1 that I purchased didn't have a made case, the person I bought it from sold it to me in a wooden coffin-like case. It's main defect was the floppy drive failing. I replaced it twice and tried wiring an SD card input to it which was able to obviously store quite a few more samples.
 

Mamofish

Member
Octatrack is pretty cool. Feel free to share some sample tracks here for now. Some incredible gear there and liked seeing Digitone in there particularly. :)

The Korg DSS-1 that I purchased didn't have a made case, the person I bought it from sold it to me in a wooden coffin-like case. It's main defect was the floppy drive failing. I replaced it twice and tried wiring an SD card input to it which was able to obviously store quite a few more samples.
That's quite an upgrade! Were you able to get it to work? Cool to bring new life to an old synth like that.

I put together a little video playing around tonight, it's a bit overwhelming.. trying to get the hang of so much available. I've been using each device on it's own for awhile, creating some patterns. Now I'm trying to combine them all and use bits and pieces from each one and keep the flow going, the goal is to figure out an hour set and contact some venues in town.

I tried a new method recording with my phone, the video is slightly off audio...
 

Mamofish

Member
Just wanted to say that I've been going through the back catalog of this thread and there is so much great music in here! Feel a bit late to the party but, glad there is already plenty to catch up on.

Name a musician who inspired you - that may not be a virtuoso (maybe even far from it); someone who is average but respectfully good at what they write/play.

Mine is Amon Tobin, I remember the first track I ever heard of his was Slowly from a skateboarding video. I was already into electronic music but, after hearing his music it exploded my interest.

In childhood my neighbor friend and I used to have a lot of sleepover LAN parties and we started working on tracks in Fruityloops. Then I found Reason and was really drawn to that because of the "real" gear and I connected more with using the routing behind the machines to come up with interesting effects and using CV between synths. Eventually I started to feel burnt out and it was easy to load up the DAW and feel a bit directionless with all the many options and I decided that I needed a groovebox to simplify and stay focused. This has really worked for me, bringing more fun back into the hobby while also being way more productive than I was before.

There's a whole bunch of youtube videos out there about going DAWless so I know I'm not the only one who's felt this eventual burn out on the computer, I wanted to share my story in case anyone else is feeling similar.. Take the leap! :messenger_musical:
 
Last edited:

Happosai

Member
Just wanted to say that I've been going through the back catalog of this thread and there is so much great music in here! Feel a bit late to the party but, glad there is already plenty to catch up on.



Mine is Amon Tobin, I remember the first track I ever heard of his was Slowly from a skateboarding video. I was already into electronic music but, after hearing his music it exploded my interest.

In childhood my neighbor friend and I used to have a lot of sleepover LAN parties and we started working on tracks in Fruityloops. Then I found Reason and was really drawn to that because of the "real" gear and I connected more with using the routing behind the machines to come up with interesting effects and using CV between synths. Eventually I started to feel burnt out and it was easy to load up the DAW and feel a bit directionless with all the many options and I decided that I needed a groovebox to simplify and stay focused. This has really worked for me, bringing more fun back into the hobby while also being way more productive than I was before.

There's a whole bunch of youtube videos out there about going DAWless so I know I'm not the only one who's felt this eventual burn out on the computer, I wanted to share my story in case anyone else is feeling similar.. Take the leap! :messenger_musical:
With electronic instruments like drum machines and such. I started with a Boss Dr. Rhythm DR-110 when I was about 11-years old. I couldn't play much guitar back then or anything else. My sister played piano and we'd make up songs. I used the preset percussion loops and the press-and-play percussion triggers. I wish I still had it but I lent to a cousin who sold it in the late-90's. Maybe that wasn't a bad thing. I never left percussion but I wouldn't have started woodwind, strings and piano.
 

GeekyDad

Member
With electronic instruments like drum machines and such. I started with a Boss Dr. Rhythm DR-110 when I was about 11-years old. I couldn't play much guitar back then or anything else. My sister played piano and we'd make up songs. I used the preset percussion loops and the press-and-play percussion triggers. I wish I still had it but I lent to a cousin who sold it in the late-90's. Maybe that wasn't a bad thing. I never left percussion but I wouldn't have started woodwind, strings and piano.
Blast from the freakin' past, man! Boss DR-220A here. Forgot all about that thing. Yeesh. I think I was 17. Made some stuff I thought was amazing back then. It hurts to hear now. :messenger_grinning_sweat: And not because of the device's quality, just my own lack of ability. Ugh... :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

Mamofish

Member
With electronic instruments like drum machines and such. I started with a Boss Dr. Rhythm DR-110 when I was about 11-years old. I couldn't play much guitar back then or anything else. My sister played piano and we'd make up songs. I used the preset percussion loops and the press-and-play percussion triggers. I wish I still had it but I lent to a cousin who sold it in the late-90's. Maybe that wasn't a bad thing. I never left percussion but I wouldn't have started woodwind, strings and piano.

Blast from the freakin' past, man! Boss DR-220A here. Forgot all about that thing. Yeesh. I think I was 17. Made some stuff I thought was amazing back then. It hurts to hear now. :messenger_grinning_sweat: And not because of the device's quality, just my own lack of ability. Ugh... :messenger_tears_of_joy:

That's awesome! I wish I was exposed to some stuff like that growing up. None of my family were musicians but, my brother's loved collecting CD's when those came out and listened to a lot. I had a boombox radio with 2 cassette players in it, I used to record songs off the radio and put my voice in between like I was running my own radio station.
 
So since I'm having a hell of a time trying to book shows, I filmed a performance I did at a friend's studio space in November. If you dig electronic music check it out. It's this Friday on Bandcamp.

It's at an odd time (3PM Eastern) because I am trying to account for UK folk, who make up a chunk of my "listeners".

If money's tight hit me up via DM and I'll email you an invite! Trying to get more than 10 people on board 😂

 
Last edited:

Mamofish

Member
Just went back and listened to all of Silent Graphs.. amazing tracks! Love the sound and feel. Vitamin Mind and ISO7001 were my personal favs. How did you do the visuals?

I've been toying with using milkdrop on an old pc, you can use the linein:// function in winamp to get it to visualize the input instead. Not sure if that has licensing issues though if it was something official. I've also seen some sets where someone else is livecoding visuals in some language as the set is going, not sure exactly what that is..
 
Last edited:

GeekyDad

Member
Ugh...sometimes I spend too much time fiddling. And this is why I make new project saves anytime I do something even remotely significant in terms of mixing. Had to finally take a break and give my ears some rest. Was beginning to lose the separation this whole mix was based on.
 

GeekyDad

Member
Anyone have experience using harmonic distortion (I assume it would be positive smoothing?) for mixing/mastering? Looking to smooth out some rough edges of an (mostly) acoustic mix. Was thinking about perhaps trying this approach.

Thanks
 

Happosai

Member
Anyone have experience using harmonic distortion (I assume it would be positive smoothing?) for mixing/mastering? Looking to smooth out some rough edges of an (mostly) acoustic mix. Was thinking about perhaps trying this approach.

Thanks
I'd run harmonic distortion with an unpublished piece and go back & try traditional mixing to see which fits best. Maybe not entirely on topic but I went through a time of running stereo mixes on top of everything. I recall once with an acoustic guitar recording and then trying the practical overdubbing of two guitars...and that was it. It didn't work for every instrument but sometimes it was simply just getting behind the mixer to get the smooth edges.
 

GeekyDad

Member
I'd run harmonic distortion with an unpublished piece and go back & try traditional mixing to see which fits best. Maybe not entirely on topic but I went through a time of running stereo mixes on top of everything. I recall once with an acoustic guitar recording and then trying the practical overdubbing of two guitars...and that was it. It didn't work for every instrument but sometimes it was simply just getting behind the mixer to get the smooth edges.
Let me ask you this: when you do a mix down to WAV or FLAC (or whatever your preference), if you've ever brought that mix back into your DAW to work with it anew with other instruments, etc., would you say you've noticed any difference in the fidelity? I know they've used the term "lossless" for decades, but my ears are either tricking me, or it's not truly lossless in terms of maintaining its quality.

I'm on an old (!!!) PC, and man, when the mix starts growing, the CPU starts panting, usually causing shutdown of the software. I'm thinking if I'm going to try what you're suggesting, that would probably be the only way to do it. Adding another single plugin, and this thing's gonna go kaput.
 

Happosai

Member
Let me ask you this: when you do a mix down to WAV or FLAC (or whatever your preference), if you've ever brought that mix back into your DAW to work with it anew with other instruments, etc., would you say you've noticed any difference in the fidelity? I know they've used the term "lossless" for decades, but my ears are either tricking me, or it's not truly lossless in terms of maintaining its quality.

I'm on an old (!!!) PC, and man, when the mix starts growing, the CPU starts panting, usually causing shutdown of the software. I'm thinking if I'm going to try what you're suggesting, that would probably be the only way to do it. Adding another single plugin, and this thing's gonna go kaput.
Very rarely have I ever brought a mix back to the DAW - so it's tough to get you the answer you're looking for. WAV will not come back the same, although it should. FLAC it could be your ears but the only way to be able to tell if there's a difference it to bring out the grid and do the math. The DAW will have multiple channels for each overdub and you'd have to be able to calculate a closer to master mix to see if the two are the same. Honestly, I've thought the same myself that it always sounds clearer through the DAW. The last bigger recording session I did in 2018, I recorded 6 tracks in studio and they sounded great in the DAW. I took all of the raw files and sent them to an old audio engineer friend of mine. When he sent the FLACs back -- there was a noticeable change. I remember one track where the guitar, bass, drums, and Rhodes were all recorded separately. The mix for the percussion sounded a bit fat and the other instruments sounded like it was recorded all in the same studio room. That's not possible because I played everything.

The only true lossless I'm convinced that existed was when studios were recording on analog or with old hybrid consoles. The only things I get out of a DAW that don't sound compressed are the MIDI instruments. Anything else does seem to have a slight difference. Yeah, I wouldn't add that extra plugin. I can't see your screen but I had a friend who was heavy on overdubs in his studio. This was in the 2000's and working with an iMac and ProLogic. He'd have 16 channels open and hot. Sounded amazing but only took about 2-minutes before everything crashed.
 

GeekyDad

Member
Very rarely have I ever brought a mix back to the DAW - so it's tough to get you the answer you're looking for. WAV will not come back the same, although it should. FLAC it could be your ears but the only way to be able to tell if there's a difference it to bring out the grid and do the math. The DAW will have multiple channels for each overdub and you'd have to be able to calculate a closer to master mix to see if the two are the same. Honestly, I've thought the same myself that it always sounds clearer through the DAW. The last bigger recording session I did in 2018, I recorded 6 tracks in studio and they sounded great in the DAW. I took all of the raw files and sent them to an old audio engineer friend of mine. When he sent the FLACs back -- there was a noticeable change. I remember one track where the guitar, bass, drums, and Rhodes were all recorded separately. The mix for the percussion sounded a bit fat and the other instruments sounded like it was recorded all in the same studio room. That's not possible because I played everything.

The only true lossless I'm convinced that existed was when studios were recording on analog or with old hybrid consoles. The only things I get out of a DAW that don't sound compressed are the MIDI instruments. Anything else does seem to have a slight difference. Yeah, I wouldn't add that extra plugin. I can't see your screen but I had a friend who was heavy on overdubs in his studio. This was in the 2000's and working with an iMac and ProLogic. He'd have 16 channels open and hot. Sounded amazing but only took about 2-minutes before everything crashed.
Yeah, the only thing I know about it is WAV is supposed to be uncompressed and truly lossless. But perhaps anytime you convert analog to digital information there's (no matter how inaudible it's claimed to be) some slight shaving of the audio. Right now, my work method is to record all my acoustic tracks on my old (from the 90s) Roland workstation, back-up the data to CD-R, bring that data into Reaver on my PC, render that data in WAV stems, and then work with them in Tracktion Wave form. It still sounds good, but I could swear things just sound more full when I listen back on the Roland.
 
Top Bottom